← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportLow impact1 neutral

Japanese Patent Office invalidates Red's key Raw video patent after Panasonic challenge

🔄 Updated 50d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Japanese Patent Office invalidated a key Red Raw video patent.
  • The patent was challenged by Panasonic.
  • The court found claims in the 2008 patent obvious to skilled individuals.
  • Nikon, which acquired Red, previously argued the patent was invalid.

Patent Invalidation by Japanese Court

The Japanese Patent Office has ruled one of Red's primary Raw video patents invalid. This decision came after a challenge was filed by Panasonic, targeting a patent originally filed in the US in 2008.

Grounds for Invalidation

The court determined that many of the claims within the patent, which describes a high-resolution video camera compressing its Raw data, would have been apparent to someone with expertise in the field and knowledge of existing technologies at the time of filing. This patent has been central to past legal disputes involving companies like Sony and Apple.

Nikon's Role and Acquisition of Red

Nikon's video subsidiary was in the position of defending this patent, despite Nikon itself having previously argued its invalidity. Nikon resolved its own dispute with Red by acquiring the company, integrating Red's cinema camera and Raw knowledge into recent Nikon models.

Potential Industry Impact

The full impact of this patent's invalidation is uncertain. Many major camera manufacturers, including Canon, Panasonic, Sony, and Blackmagic Design, now offer cameras with internal Raw video capture. One potential consequence could be the abolition of license fees reportedly paid to Red by users of Apple's ProRes RAW codec. However, Red's transition from a privately held company to being part of Nikon makes it difficult to assess the financial significance of these fees, and any cost reductions may not necessarily be passed on to consumers.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~4 min · 3 stories · Oct 04

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Primary sources

GitHub zloirock/core-js

Reporting from

The Japanese Patent Office has invalidated one of Red's core Raw video patents, following a challenge initiated by Panasonic. This decision could affect licensing fees related to Raw video codecs, though the full impact is unclear given Red's acquisition by Nikon and widespread internal Raw video capture capabilities in modern cameras.