← All stories
● Covered by 2 sources · 2 reportsMedium impact

Midjourney Challenges Hollywood Studios to Disclose AI Usage in Copyright Lawsuit

🔄 Updated 90d ago — new reporting from TechCrunch
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Midjourney seeks AI usage details from studios
  • Hollywood studios sued Midjourney for copyright infringement
  • A judge limited the studios' disclosure to consumer-facing AI
  • Midjourney claims studios also use copyrighted data for AI training
  • Midjourney argues for more extensive documentation from the studios

Overview of the Lawsuit

Midjourney is currently involved in a legal battle with major Hollywood studios, including Warner Bros., Disney, and Universal, which have accused it of copyright infringement. The studios claim that Midjourney's AI can generate images resembling their copyrighted characters, such as Superman and Bart Simpson.

Midjourney's Request for AI Usage Information

In response to the ongoing lawsuits, Midjourney has filed a motion requesting that the studios disclose how they utilize AI technologies in their operations. The company asserts that the studios should reveal their AI business plans, research reports, training datasets, and other relevant documentation.

Judicial Decisions on Disclosure

A magistrate judge has previously permitted the studios to withhold most documentation regarding their AI usage, only requiring them to provide information related to 'consumer-facing' applications. Midjourney is now challenging this limitation, arguing that it prevents them from accessing vital documentation that could support their defense.

Fair Use Defense

Midjourney contends that its training practices involving publicly available images fall under fair use. They argue that the studios, which are also leveraging copyrighted data for their own AI models, do not have grounds to claim exclusivity on such practices. This claim is central to Midjourney's defense strategy.

Potential Implications

The outcome of this legal dispute could set significant precedents regarding the usage of AI in creative industries, particularly concerning copyright laws and fair use. If Midjourney succeeds in obtaining the requested documents, it could provide leverage against the claims made by the studios and influence the future of AI development in media.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~34 min · 27 stories · Oct 02

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

How outlets covered it

Midjourney is requesting that Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. disclose how they use AI technology as part of ongoing copyright infringement lawsuits. This move comes after a judge ruled that studios must provide some information on their AI usage, prompting Midjourney to challenge limitations on the documentation shared during the legal process.

Midjourney has requested that Warner Bros., Disney, and Universal disclose their AI usage in court, following a lawsuit accusing it of copyright infringement. The company aims to argue that the studios also use copyrighted data for their AI models, potentially undermining their claims against Midjourney.