Major datacenter builders, including Meta, Oracle, xAI, and CoreWeave, are raising billions for new facilities. They are using off-balance-sheet financing structures, where separate entities are formed to build datacenters, and the associated debt is not consolidated on the parent company's balance sheet. Meta, for example, forms a separate entity that raises funds from investors and banks, with Meta having exclusive use of the datacenter once built.
The Financial Times reported in December 2025 that tech companies had shifted over $120 billion of AI datacenter spending off their balance sheets using special-purpose vehicles. Goldman Sachs projects hyperscalers could spend $5.3 trillion on AI and datacenters through 2030, with private markets playing a significant role in financing. Skeptics worry about the long-term impact of this debt and the transparency of these financial arrangements.
Despite concerns, the current financing practices are not considered comparable to the Enron scandal. Enron's failure in 2001 involved widespread fraud, leading to billions in losses and a market meltdown. While scrutiny of current financing methods is warranted, the scale and nature of the activities by today's tech companies are not indicative of similar fraudulent practices.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
Some experts express concern over tech companies like Meta and Oracle using off-balance-sheet financing for AI datacenters, with over $120 billion shifted off balance sheets by December 2025. This financing method, while raising scrutiny, is not considered an "AI debt bomb" crisis akin to Enron's fraudulent activities.