← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 negative

Anti-fraud tools struggle against scammers exploiting cheap internet calling and AI

🔄 Updated 1d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Scammers adapt faster than current anti-fraud tools.
  • Cheap internet calling enables widespread fraudulent activity.
  • STIR/SHAKEN protocol is not a complete solution.
  • Bad actors obtain legitimate numbers, bypassing authentication.

Scammers Outpace Anti-Fraud Measures

Industry experts at a Broadband Breakfast Live Online panel on July 29, 2026, indicated that tools designed to combat phishing, robocalls, and spam are not keeping up with the rapid adaptation of criminals. Despite a decade of development in anti-fraud technologies, scammers are quickly finding new ways to exploit vulnerabilities, particularly through cheap internet-based calling and artificial intelligence.

The Impact of Internet Calling

Josh Bercu, executive director of the Industry Traceback Group at USTelecom, explained that the rise of internet calling has made it inexpensive and easy for anyone, including malicious actors, to make calls globally. This shift has eliminated the inherent trust of older wired networks, where physical connections verified identities. Now, callers can easily misrepresent themselves, claiming to be legitimate entities like banks without verification.

Limitations of STIR/SHAKEN

The STIR/SHAKEN call authentication protocol, while helpful, was never intended to be a complete solution, according to Joel Bernstein, vice president at Somos. Both experts agreed that the protocol has been oversold and only provides a basic level of understanding when combined with other measures. Bercu noted that some bad actors now acquire legitimate numbers, allowing them to bypass STIR/SHAKEN authentication and still make fraudulent calls.

Need for New Authentication Approaches

Bernstein suggested a move towards a "right-to-use" system, where individual callers would have cryptographic tokens verifying their identity. This system would allow entities like banks to recognize both the caller and themselves as legitimate. The ongoing challenge stems from a fundamental change in how carriers operate, requiring a reevaluation of authentication strategies to address the evolving tactics of scammers.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~7 min · 6 stories · Aug 15

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

Industry experts state that existing anti-fraud tools like STIR/SHAKEN cannot keep pace with scammers who exploit cheap internet calling and artificial intelligence to conduct phishing, robocalls, and spam. The shift to internet-based calling has removed traditional network trust, making it easier for bad actors to spoof identities and obtain legitimate numbers for fraudulent activities. This situation highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach and potentially new authentication methods to combat evolving scam tactics.