← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportLow impact1 neutral

Appeals Court Upholds Verdict Clearing Apple of Copyright Infringement for 'Servant'

🔄 Updated 15d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Ninth Circuit upheld a verdict favoring Apple and M. Night Shyamalan.
  • Lawsuit alleged 'Servant' copied Francesca Gregorini's 2013 film.
  • Jury previously found 'Servant' creators had no access to Gregorini's film.
  • Appeals court rejected arguments on jury instructions and verdict acceptance.

Copyright Infringement Claim Dismissed

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has upheld a verdict that cleared Apple of copyright infringement allegations concerning its Apple TV+ series 'Servant'. Italian-born director Francesca Gregorini had sued Apple and M. Night Shyamalan, claiming 'Servant' copied the plot from her 2013 film 'The Truth About Emanuel'.

Background of the Lawsuit

'Servant', a psychological thriller, premiered on Apple TV+ and ran for four seasons. Gregorini filed her lawsuit shortly after the series debuted, seeking up to $81 million in damages. In January of last year, a jury unanimously ruled in favor of Apple and Shyamalan, concluding that the creators of 'Servant' did not have access to Gregorini's film prior to developing the series.

Appeals Court Review

Gregorini appealed the jury's verdict, challenging two aspects of the trial. She argued that the jury should have received more detailed instructions regarding what constitutes 'widespread dissemination' of a film within the entertainment industry. Additionally, she contested the trial judge's decision to accept the verdict without first answering a juror's question seeking clarification on the term 'widespread dissemination'.

Ninth Circuit's Decision

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected both of Gregorini's arguments. The court found that the jury instructions accurately reflected the applicable law and that the trial judge was not obligated to provide a more detailed definition of 'widely disseminated'. It also ruled that the judge did not abuse her discretion by accepting the unanimous verdict without further addressing the jurors' question.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~4 min · 3 stories · Nov 07

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a previous ruling that found Apple's thriller series 'Servant' did not infringe on Francesca Gregorini's film 'The Truth About Emanuel'. The court rejected arguments regarding jury instructions on 'widespread dissemination' and the judge's acceptance of the verdict.