← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 neutral

Apple opposes UK proposal for App Store payment rule changes, citing price regulation concerns

🔄 Updated 1d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Apple opposes UK CMA proposal for alternative App Store payment links.
  • Apple claims the proposal constitutes price regulation and could undermine innovation.
  • CMA designated Apple and Google with "strategic market status" last year.
  • CMA intends to set principles for "fair and reasonable" steering fees, not direct prices.

Apple's Stance on UK Proposal

Apple has formally responded to a consultation by the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), expressing strong opposition to proposed rules that would mandate allowing app developers to link to alternative payment options outside the App Store. The company argues that these regulations would constitute price regulation and could negatively impact innovation and investment within its ecosystem.

CMA's Regulatory Framework

The CMA gained the authority to impose such requirements after designating Apple and Google as having "strategic market status" in their respective mobile platform markets last year. This designation, under the UK’s new digital markets regime, enables the regulator to introduce company-specific rules aimed at promoting competition and offering consumers more choices.

Proposed Fee Structure and Disagreement

Under the CMA's proposal, Apple and Google would still be permitted to charge developers a commission on purchases made through alternative payment methods, but this fee would need to be considered "fair and reasonable." The CMA anticipates these "steering fees" would be lower than current App Store charges, with savings potentially passed to UK customers or reinvested by developers. However, Apple contends that the proposal goes beyond promoting competition, giving the regulator an "intrusive" role in managing its business and regulating its prices and services.

CMA Rejects Apple's Characterization

The CMA has rejected Apple's characterization of the proposal as direct price regulation. The authority clarified that its intention is to establish principles for determining what constitutes fair and reasonable steering fees, rather than directly setting those fees itself. This ongoing dialogue highlights a significant regulatory challenge to Apple's App Store policies in the UK.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~7 min · 6 stories · Aug 15

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

Apple submitted a formal response to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), arguing against proposed rules that would allow App Store developers to use alternative payment options. Apple claims the proposal amounts to price regulation and could harm innovation, while the CMA maintains it aims to establish principles for fair and reasonable fees, not set prices directly.