← All stories
● Covered by 2 sources · 2 reportsMedium impact2 neutral

Australian Government Considers Ban on Smart Glasses in Public Offices

🔄 Updated 6d ago — new reporting from BBC Technology
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Australian government considers banning smart glasses in public offices.
  • Public service minister requested advice on potential prohibition.
  • Local councils in Australia have already banned smart glasses in public spaces.
  • Concerns stem from privacy and security due to recording capabilities.

Government Reviewing Smart Glasses Use

The Albanese government is evaluating a potential ban on smart glasses within its offices and service centers. This consideration is driven by privacy and security concerns associated with the devices' ability to record and capture information. Public service minister Katy Gallagher has requested advice from the Australian public service regarding the prohibition of these devices.

Local Councils Lead Bans

Several local councils across Australia have already implemented bans on smart glasses in public areas. Examples include Canterbury-Bankstown banning them from public pools, Brisbane city council prohibiting them from pools, and Yarra city council banning them from playgrounds, childcare centers, and gyms. The City of Sydney and Blacktown city councils have also restricted their use for recording in pools.

Privacy and Security Concerns

The primary driver for these considerations and bans is the privacy and security implications of smart glasses. Their integrated cameras allow for discreet recording, raising concerns about potential harassment and unauthorized data capture. A University of Sydney study found that 60% of smart glasses-filmed videos on Instagram could be classified as potential harassment.

International Precedents

While no national government has enacted a widespread ban across all agencies, some international bodies have restricted smart glasses. Courts in England and Wales, and New York state in the US, have banned the technology. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency reportedly classified them as body-worn cameras and barred them from federal workspaces.

Seeking Consistent Guidance

The Australian government aims to establish clear and consistent guidance for public servants regarding smart glasses. Attorney General Michelle Rowland has supported councils' decisions and indicated plans to consult businesses on their approaches, emphasizing the need to balance privacy with not unfairly discriminating against users of the technology.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~26 min · 21 stories · Sep 23

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

How outlets covered it

Australia is considering a ban on smart glasses with camera recording capabilities within government offices due to growing privacy concerns. This move reflects a broader discussion about the appropriate use of such technology in public and private spaces.

The Australian government is considering a ban on smart glasses in its public offices and service centers due to privacy and security concerns. This move follows local councils implementing similar bans in public spaces, prompted by the devices' recording capabilities.