← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportLow impact1 neutral

Authors face backlash for participation in 2022 Google AI writing study

🔄 Updated 1d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Thirteen authors participated in Google's 2022 Wordcraft Writers Workshop.
  • The workshop used an experimental AI writing tool based on LaMDA.
  • Authors are now facing backlash due to changed public sentiment on AI.
  • The study aimed to test AI as a brainstorming or collaboration tool.

Google's 2022 AI Writing Study

In 2022, Google initiated a study called the Wordcraft Writers Workshop, inviting thirteen writers, including notable science-fiction authors, to test an experimental AI writing tool. This tool was a writing-centric interface for LaMDA, Google's large language model, which later formed the basis for Gemini. Participants were given eight weeks to write a short story, using the AI as much or as little as they chose.

Purpose of the Workshop

The internal study was launched by Google researchers to evaluate whether AI could function as a brainstorming assistant, researcher, or writing collaborator for professional writers. DeepMind's Magenta project, known for its focus on arts-focused machine learning tools, hosted the study. The resulting stories and a white paper were published on Magenta's website.

Public Backlash Emerges

Four years after the study, the participating authors are facing criticism from parts of the literary community. This backlash is attributed to a significant shift in public sentiment regarding AI, particularly within creative professions, since the study's completion. An author and "anti-gen-AI absolutist" named Lily Lachance brought attention to the Wordcraft website, leading to the current controversy.

Impact on Creative Professions

The incident underscores the increasing tension between advancements in AI technology and its perceived impact on creative fields. As AI capabilities in content generation evolve, discussions around authorship, collaboration, and the role of AI in creative processes are becoming more prominent and contentious.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~7 min · 6 stories · Aug 15

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Primary sources

arXiv 2211.05030

Reporting from

Thirteen authors, including Ken Liu and Robin Sloan, are facing criticism for their involvement in a 2022 Google AI study called Wordcraft Writers Workshop, which used an experimental writing tool based on the LaMDA model. The backlash stems from a shift in public sentiment regarding AI in creative fields since the study's completion. This event highlights the growing tension between AI development and creative professions.