← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportLow impact1 neutral

Claims that China's Tang Dynasty never existed spread on Chinese internet

🔄 Updated 52m ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • A history influencer claimed the Tang Dynasty was a myth using astrological data.
  • The claim spread on Weibo, garnering tens of millions of views.
  • The Tang Dynasty is a foundational period in Chinese history.
  • State media has responded to the spread of this historical fallacy.

Historical Revisionism on Chinese Social Media

A recent phenomenon on China's internet involves a vocal segment asserting that the Tang Dynasty, which ruled from 618 AD to 907 AD, never existed. This period is widely recognized for its territorial expansion, international trade, and cultural flourishing, forming a core part of Chinese historical education.

Origin and Spread of the Claim

The claim originated in May from a history influencer named Qiao Yu, who used astrological data in a video to 'prove' the Tang Dynasty was a myth. This outlandish assertion subsequently gained traction, leading to reports of individuals contacting the Xi'an tourism bureau, the site of the ancient Tang capital, to demand its closure. The hashtag 'the Tang dynasty doesn’t exist' has accumulated tens of millions of views on Weibo, China's equivalent of X.

Motivations and Context

The precise motivations behind the hoax are unclear. Historically, the Tang Dynasty has faced criticism from Chinese nationalists because its founding emperor was not of Han ethnic origin. Qiao Yu's claim posits that the succeeding Song Dynasty began earlier than traditionally accepted, thereby negating the Tang's existence. The Song Dynasty was of ethnic Han origin. Harvard professor William Kirby described the claim as 'insane,' emphasizing the factual basis of the Tang Dynasty's existence.

Official Response and Public Impact

As the fallacy spread, China's state media, which is tightly controlled, intervened. The Nanjing Daily reported that parents expressed concern over their children's confusion regarding historical facts due to the hoax. The Paper, an outlet affiliated with the Shanghai government, also published a more forceful response, indicating official disapproval of the historical revisionism.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~7 min · 6 stories · Aug 24

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

A trend on China's internet, initiated by an influencer, claims the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD) never existed, causing confusion and prompting state media response. This challenges established historical narratives and highlights the Chinese Communist Party's control over historical discourse.