The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) utilized an obscure provision of federal law, 19 USC 1509, to obtain YouTube account information for Minneapolis journalist Georgia Fort. This action followed two rejections by a judge for search warrants for the same data, citing a lack of probable cause and the need for the subjects to be informed.
After federal prosecutors withdrew their warrant requests in February, DHS served Google with an administrative summons for Fort's YouTube data less than a month later. This method, which only requires a sign-off from a DHS official, bypassed the judicial approval process that had previously denied the government's attempts.
The statute, 19 USC 1509, grants DHS broad power to inspect records for customs and import duty investigations. However, former DHS lawyer Chris Duncan stated that these laws are unrelated to domestic situations, social media posts, or immigration matters. John Roth, former DHS Inspector General, called the use of this subpoena for a non-customs case "improper."
Georgia Fort was not notified of the request for her information, nor was she given an opportunity to contest it. The administrative summons also instructed the recipients, such as Google, to keep the request secret, further limiting transparency and the ability of individuals to challenge the government's access to their data.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) used an obscure customs law (19 USC 1509) to obtain YouTube account information for a journalist, Georgia Fort, after a judge rejected warrant requests. This method bypasses judicial review, requiring only a DHS official's sign-off, and has raised concerns about government overreach in obtaining private data.