← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 negative

EFF Urges Governor Newsom to Veto California's AB 1709 Social Media Ban for Under-16s

🔄 Updated 1h ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • California's AB 1709 bans social media for users under 16.
  • EFF urges Governor Newsom to veto the bill.
  • The bill restricts access to online communities and information.
  • Concerns raised about privacy due to age verification requirements.

California Legislature Passes AB 1709

The California legislature has passed Assembly Bill 1709 (A.B. 1709), a measure that prohibits social media use for individuals under the age of 16. This legislation aims to restrict young people's access to online platforms.

EFF Calls for Veto

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is urging Governor Gavin Newsom to veto A.B. 1709. The organization states that while the bill may be well-intentioned, it is deeply flawed and could harm young people by cutting them off from essential information and experiences, especially vulnerable youth and marginalized groups who rely on online communities for support.

Impact on Social Media Functionality

If enacted, A.B. 1709 would prohibit platforms from offering recommendation algorithms and basic input features, such as following users or liking posts, to anyone under 16. The EFF argues that these are fundamental tools for online services to deliver content and for users to find communities and audiences for their own speech. The bill's broad definition of "addictive features" could effectively lock young people out of major digital services.

Privacy and Free Speech Concerns

The EFF characterizes A.B. 1709 as a "massive privacy and free speech nightmare." They contend that denying young people access to digital forums or stripping essential navigation tools does not enhance safety or health. Research cited by the EFF suggests social media bans are ineffective and can hinder young people's development of their voices and perspectives.

Furthermore, the bill could force platforms to implement invasive age-verification methods, such as government IDs or biometric scanning. This would concentrate more personal data with tech companies, creating "honeypots" of sensitive information, damaging online anonymity, and increasing the risk of data breaches for users of all ages.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~24 min · 20 stories · Sep 01

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

The California legislature passed Assembly Bill 1709 (A.B. 1709), which bans social media use for individuals under 16, prompting the EFF to call for a gubernatorial veto. The EFF argues the bill restricts access to essential information and online communities, particularly for vulnerable youth, and could lead to privacy issues through mandatory age verification.