← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 neutral

Former DOJ Antitrust Chief Jonathan Kanter Discusses AI Safety, Regulation, and Antitrust Exemptions

🔄 Updated 4d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • AI companies propose antitrust exemptions for safety coordination.
  • Critics suggest this is a move towards regulatory capture or cartel formation.
  • Jonathan Kanter led major antitrust cases against Google, Apple, and Ticketmaster.
  • The debate involves how regulation interacts with antitrust law and competition policy.

AI Safety and Regulatory Proposals

The discussion around AI safety and regulation has intensified, with researchers from major AI labs like Anthropic and Google DeepMind raising concerns about model threats and industry-wide safety practices. Some researchers estimate a significant chance of AI causing catastrophic outcomes, leading CEOs of AI companies to advocate for development slowdowns and new regulations.

Antitrust Exemptions and Criticisms

A key proposal from AI companies involves seeking antitrust exemptions to coordinate on safety issues. This has drawn criticism, with accusations that these companies are attempting regulatory capture, forming a cartel, or trying to alleviate investor pressure before their IPOs. The implications of such exemptions for market competition are a central point of contention.

Expert Perspective on Antitrust

Jonathan Kanter, who served as the antitrust chief for the US Department of Justice during the Biden administration, provided insights into these issues. Kanter, now a professor at WashU and Carnegie Mellon, previously spearheaded significant antitrust cases against major tech entities such as Google, Apple, and Ticketmaster, signaling a reboot of American antitrust policy.

Broader Implications

The conversation delves into the complexities of how potential AI regulation might intersect with existing antitrust laws, competition policies, and international relations, particularly with China. The debate highlights the tension between fostering innovation, ensuring safety, and maintaining competitive markets within the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~26 min · 21 stories · Sep 23

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

Jonathan Kanter, former US DOJ antitrust chief, discussed the debate surrounding AI safety, regulation, and proposals for antitrust exemptions for AI companies. This conversation addresses concerns that AI companies are seeking regulatory capture or cartel formation under the guise of safety coordination.