← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportLow impact1 neutral

Implementing the PImpl Idiom in C++ and its Simplification with C++26 std::indirect

🔄 Updated 54m ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • PImpl separates interface and implementation in C++.
  • It minimizes compile-time dependencies.
  • Traditional PImpl uses raw pointers and the Rule of Five.
  • C++26 `std::indirect` simplifies PImpl implementation.

Understanding the PImpl Idiom

PImpl, or Pointer to Implementation, is a C++ programming technique designed to hide implementation details of a class. This is achieved by moving these details into a separate, private class that is then accessed through a pointer within the public class. The primary goal is to decouple interfaces from their implementations, thereby reducing compile-time dependencies and improving build times.

Traditional PImpl Implementation with Raw Pointers

Implementing the PImpl idiom traditionally involves using raw pointers and adhering to the Rule of Five. The Rule of Five dictates that if a class defines any of the special member functions (destructor, copy constructor, copy assignment operator, move constructor, or move assignment operator) for resource management, it should define all five. This ensures correct resource handling, especially when dealing with dynamically allocated memory for the implementation details.

Example: A Widget Class

Consider a `Widget` class representing a UI element with a label and a click counter. To hide these implementation details, a nested `Impl` struct is forward-declared in the `Widget` class header and fully defined in the `.cpp` file. The `Widget` class then holds a raw pointer (`pimpl_`) to an instance of `Impl`. This setup requires the `Widget` class to explicitly define all five special member functions to manage the `Impl` object's lifetime and copying behavior.

Simplification with C++26 std::indirect

C++26 introduces `std::indirect`, a new type that aims to simplify the PImpl idiom. While the article does not detail the exact usage of `std::indirect`, its purpose is to abstract away the boilerplate code associated with manual pointer management and the Rule of Five, making PImpl implementations more concise and less error-prone for developers.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~39 min · 35 stories · Jul 22

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

The PImpl idiom separates interface from implementation in C++ classes to minimize compile-time dependencies. This technique involves placing implementation details in a separate class accessed via an opaque pointer. C++26 introduces `std::indirect` to simplify this idiom's implementation.