A recent comparison by Jeff Geerling revealed that the Intel Core 5 320 chip in a Dell XPS 13 demonstrated superior performance per Watt compared to Apple Silicon in a MacBook Neo. The Dell XPS 13 achieved 6.21 Gflops/W, while the MacBook Neo reached 5.38 Gflops/W during the HPL Linpak test, a benchmark used for supercomputers.
In the HPL Linpak test, the MacBook Neo produced 57.012 Gflops at 10.6W, resulting in 5.38 Gflops/W. The Dell XPS 13, powered by the Intel Core 5 320, delivered 127.91 Gflops at 20.6W, yielding 6.21 Gflops/W. This performance metric places the Dell XPS 13 above M3 and M4 Mac Studios, only being surpassed by the M4 Mac Mini at 7.57 Gflops/W. Furthermore, the XPS 13 matched the MacBook's energy efficiency during idle and web browsing activities.
These results challenge the long-held belief that ARM architecture inherently offers significant power consumption advantages over x86. The performance of the Core 5 320 chip suggests that the observed efficiency differences may be more attributable to specific chip designs and optimizations rather than the instruction set architecture itself. This development indicates a narrowing gap in power efficiency between x86 and ARM processors.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
A recent benchmark comparison shows the Intel Core 5 320 chip in a Dell XPS 13 achieving higher performance per Watt than Apple Silicon in a MacBook Neo for the HPL Linpak test. This indicates that x86 architecture, specifically Intel's latest offerings, is closing the efficiency gap with ARM-based chips, challenging previous assumptions about ARM's inherent power consumption advantages.