← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 negative

Microsoft Copilot AI Chatbot Prompts and User-Uploaded Images Reviewed by Human Contractors

🔄 Updated 3d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Human contractors review Copilot user prompts and uploaded images.
  • Reviewers encounter sexually explicit and pro-anorexia content.
  • User-uploaded images, including personal photos, are not private.
  • This extends a known practice of human review for AI chatbot text prompts to images.

Human Review of Copilot Interactions

Human contractors hired by Microsoft to improve the Copilot AI chatbot are actively reviewing user prompts and uploaded images. This includes content that is sexually explicit, such as requests for photo editing that involve lewd or sexual positions, and images uploaded by users themselves. The contractors are tasked with evaluating whether the AI successfully fulfills these prompts.

Privacy Concerns for Users

Users who upload personal images to Copilot likely expect these interactions to remain private between themselves and the AI tool. However, a workforce of hundreds of human reviewers has access to these prompts and uploaded images. This practice extends beyond text prompts, as previously revealed for OpenAI's ChatGPT, to include visual content submitted by users.

Disturbing Content Encountered by Reviewers

Contractors have reported being inundated with requests for disturbing content, including foot fetish images of children's cartoon characters, alterations to women's clothing, and images depicting pro-anorexia content. Internal documents seen by 404 Media, including instruction guides and real user prompts, confirm the nature of the content reviewed. One contractor noted that faces in uploaded images are often uncensored, and many prompts are sexual and of dubious consent.

Implications for AI Development and User Trust

The revelation highlights the extensive human involvement in AI model training and content moderation, even for seemingly private user interactions. This practice raises questions about user data privacy and the ethical considerations of exposing human workers to potentially harmful or explicit content as part of AI improvement processes. It underscores the ongoing challenges in managing user-generated content within AI systems.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~34 min · 27 stories · Oct 02

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

Human contractors working to improve Microsoft's Copilot AI chatbot are reviewing user prompts and uploaded images, including sexually explicit and disturbing content. This practice reveals that AI companies use human workers to moderate both text and visual inputs, raising privacy concerns for users who expect their interactions with AI tools to remain private.