Samsung has reportedly abandoned plans to reintroduce variable-aperture camera technology in its upcoming Galaxy S27 series. This decision contradicts earlier rumors that suggested the feature might return, particularly for the Galaxy S27 Ultra model.
Samsung previously featured a variable-aperture camera in the Galaxy S9+ in 2018. This technology allowed the camera hardware to physically adjust the amount of light entering the sensor, offering more flexible shooting capabilities. The company was reportedly considering its reintroduction in response to Apple's potential use of similar hardware in future iPhone models.
According to ETNews, the primary reasons for Samsung's decision are the increased manufacturing costs associated with variable-aperture cameras and the resulting thicker camera modules. These factors were deemed significant enough to outweigh the potential benefits, especially given the likely limited impact on the final image output and the current economic climate affecting camera component costs.
The Galaxy S27 series is anticipated to launch early next year. Beyond the variable-aperture camera decision, there are also indications that the Ultra model might feature one less telephoto camera. These changes suggest a focus on managing costs and design constraints for the next generation of Samsung smartphones.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
Samsung has reportedly decided against reintroducing variable-aperture cameras in its upcoming Galaxy S27 series, despite earlier rumors. The decision was influenced by higher manufacturing costs and the increased thickness required for the camera module.