An anti-pattern is defined as a process or action that initially seems appropriate but ultimately causes more harm than good. In the context of startups, these are patterns that increase inherent risks. While it is difficult to pinpoint exact reasons for startup success, experienced individuals can often identify factors contributing to failure.
Simeon Simeonov, who first introduced the concept of startup anti-patterns in 2013, is collaborating with Itamar Novick from Recursive Ventures to develop a comprehensive series on this topic. This series will provide tangible examples from their experiences as founders and investors, as well as insights from guest founders within their portfolio.
The initiative emphasizes that studying repeatable patterns of startup failure is more useful than analyzing non-repeatable strategies for success. Each anti-pattern, while not immediately fatal, can accumulate, cloud focus, and hinder execution, ultimately increasing the likelihood of a startup's demise.
The developing list of startup anti-patterns includes various behaviors and strategies. Some examples are "Elephant hunting," "Ignorance," "Platform risk," "If you build it, they will come," "Bad revenue," "Chasing the competition," and "Analysis paralysis." The full list is a work in progress, with many more items identified.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
Simeon Simeonov and Itamar Novick are developing a series on startup anti-patterns, which are common practices that appear beneficial but lead to negative consequences for startups. This initiative aims to help founders and investors identify and avoid patterns that increase the risk of startup failure.