← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 neutral

Study finds AI-generated stories rated higher quality than human-written ones by readers

🔄 Updated 1d ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • 1,682 adults read six short stories, three by humans and three by ChatGPT.
  • AI-generated stories were rated higher in absorption and quality.
  • Participants preferred stories they were told were human-written, regardless of origin.
  • Attitudes towards AI influenced ratings of AI-attributed stories.

AI Stories Outperform Human Counterparts in Quality Ratings

A recent study involving 1,682 adults revealed that short stories created by ChatGPT were rated as more absorbing and of higher quality compared to human-authored stories. Participants were asked to read one of six stories, with three written by humans and three by AI, each AI story mirroring a human-written theme.

Impact of Attribution and Reader Perception

Despite the higher quality ratings for AI-generated content, participants generally gave higher scores to stories they were informed were written by humans, regardless of the actual author. The study also noted that individuals with more positive attitudes toward AI tended to rate stories attributed to ChatGPT more favorably.

Implications for AI's Creative Abilities

Dr. Deena Skolnick Weisberg of Villanova University, a senior author of the research, stated that AI systems can already generate short stories perceived as good as, or better than, human-written ones. This suggests a need to update perceptions of AI's capabilities in creative fields. However, Weisberg also emphasized that this does not diminish the value of human creativity and self-expression in writing.

Difficulty in Distinguishing AI from Human Authorship

Two additional experiments with 905 adults tested participants' ability to identify human versus AI authorship. In one experiment, approximately 40% guessed correctly, which is worse than chance. In the other, 52% guessed correctly, indicating a general difficulty in distinguishing between human and AI-generated narratives.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~7 min · 6 stories · Aug 15

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

A study published in the journal Judgment and Decision Making found that participants rated short stories generated by ChatGPT as more absorbing and of higher quality than human-written stories. This research indicates that AI systems can produce creative content perceived as equal to or better than human output, challenging previous assumptions about AI's creative capabilities.