← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportLow impact1 neutral

Study finds techno-optimistic scientists less likely to engage in climate action

🔄 Updated 2h ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Techno-optimistic scientists are 23% less likely to protest or sign petitions.
  • They are 18% less likely to make high-impact lifestyle changes.
  • The study surveyed over 9,000 scientists across 115 countries.
  • Techno-optimism was more common among right-leaning scientists and those in applied/natural sciences.

Techno-Optimism and Climate Action

A study from the London School of Economics indicates that scientists who hold a strong belief in technology's ability to solve climate change are less inclined to engage in civic actions related to the issue. These "techno-optimistic" scientists were found to be 23% less likely to sign petitions or participate in protests compared to their peers who are more skeptical of technological solutions.

The report also highlighted that these scientists are 18% less likely to adopt high-impact lifestyle changes, such as reducing flights or adopting a vegan or vegetarian diet. This suggests a correlation between faith in technological fixes and reduced personal and civic engagement in climate action.

Study Scope and Findings

The research surveyed more than 9,000 scientists across 115 countries. Of those surveyed, 27% agreed that technology would largely solve climate change problems, while 44% disagreed. The remaining 29% neither agreed nor disagreed.

The study, published in Environmental Research Letters, also identified that techno-optimism was more prevalent among scientists with right-leaning political views and those working in applied and natural sciences.

Implications of Techno-Optimism

Fabian Dablander, the lead author, stated that an over-reliance on unproven technological solutions, driven by techno-optimism, could detract from the necessary socioeconomic transformations required to address the climate crisis. He noted that technological solutions are often politically attractive because they promise to address climate change without demanding changes in human lifestyles and consumption patterns.

Dablander emphasized that technology alone cannot substitute for broader societal changes and large-scale shifts in consumption, which are also crucial for effective climate action.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~5 min · 3 stories · Oct 07

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

A London School of Economics study found scientists who believe technology will largely solve climate change are less likely to participate in civic action or make high-impact lifestyle changes. This "techno-optimism" correlates with reduced engagement in protests, petitions, and personal consumption shifts, suggesting a reliance on unproven solutions over broader societal transformations.