← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 negative

US Justice Department Prosecutes American for Using Duress Password to Wipe Phone at Border

🔄 Updated 1h ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • First known U.S. case prosecuting use of a duress password to wipe phone data.
  • Defendant Samuel Tunick allegedly used a GrapheneOS feature at the border.
  • Tunick's attorneys argue unlawful seizure and denial of legal rights.
  • Case questions constitutional rights at U.S. borders.

First Prosecution for Duress Password Use

The U.S. Justice Department has initiated a prosecution against an American citizen, Samuel Tunick, for allegedly providing a "duress" password to border authorities that resulted in the wiping of his phone's contents. This is reportedly the first instance in the United States where federal prosecutors have charged an individual for the alleged destruction of data using such a feature built into a phone's software.

GrapheneOS Feature at Center of Case

The case revolves around a feature found in GrapheneOS, a custom Android operating system often used on Google Pixel devices, which Tunick's phone was confirmed to be running. This software allows a device owner to configure a specific passcode that, when entered instead of the standard unlock code, deliberately erases all data on the device.

Legal Challenge to Border Search and Seizure

Tunick's attorneys are challenging the charges, arguing that the seizure of his phone by U.S. Customs and Border Protection upon his return to the U.S. was unlawful. They contend that any evidence obtained, including the alleged phone wiping, should be suppressed because Tunick was denied access to an attorney and not informed of his legal rights during a secondary inspection at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport.

Constitutional Rights at the Border

This prosecution brings to the forefront ongoing debates regarding the extent of constitutional rights at U.S. borders. The U.S. government has historically maintained that the border is not considered U.S. soil until a person is officially authorized to enter, which impacts the applicability of certain legal protections. Tunick's defense also suggests the government's true intent for the search was related to his association with an environmental movement, rather than the stated pretext of searching for child exploitation imagery.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~15 min · 15 stories · Jul 24

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

The U.S. Justice Department is prosecuting an American citizen for allegedly using a "duress" password to wipe his phone's data during a border search, marking the first known case of its kind. This case raises questions about constitutional rights at the border and the legality of data destruction features in privacy-focused operating systems like GrapheneOS.