← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 negative

Wearable Sleep Trackers Use Brainwave Data for AI Training Without Explicit Consent

🔄 Updated 10h ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Wearable sleep trackers collect millions of hours of EEG data.
  • Companies use this data to train AI brain foundation models.
  • Privacy policies often did not explicitly disclose AI training use.
  • Interaxon updated its policy after the investigation.

Undisclosed Use of Brainwave Data

An investigation by Science, in collaboration with the Pulitzer Center's AI Accountability Network, revealed that companies manufacturing wearable sleep trackers are utilizing customer brainwave data (electroencephalography or EEG recordings) to train artificial intelligence models. These companies have amassed tens of millions of hours of EEG data from users.

AI Model Training Without Explicit Consent

Several neurology companies, including Interaxon (maker of the Muse headband) and Emotiv, are developing brain foundation models using these recordings. The investigation found that these companies initially failed to explicitly state this use in their privacy policies, meaning customers were not fully informed that their brainwave data would be used for AI training.

Interaxon, for example, has trained an AI model with approximately 50,000 hours of EEG recordings, stating that identifying information is removed before use. However, its privacy policy did not clearly disclose this practice until after the investigation.

Privacy Policy Updates and Legal Implications

Following discussions with Science, Interaxon updated its privacy policy to explicitly inform users about the use of their brain recordings for foundation model training. Nadia Kumentas, Interaxon's Chief Marketing Officer, acknowledged the need for explicit user information. The late disclosure for data already used could expose the company to potential lawsuits.

The investigation also highlighted broader privacy issues, noting that over two-thirds of the studied companies allowed corporate data transfers without user consent. This raises concerns about data ownership and control, particularly if a neurotechnology firm is acquired. While Colorado and California have amended consumer privacy laws to cover neural data, other states have not yet done so.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~4 min · 3 stories · Nov 09

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

An investigation by Science and the Pulitzer Center's AI Accountability Network found that companies behind wearable sleep trackers are using customer brainwave data (EEG recordings) to train AI models. Several companies, including Interaxon and Emotiv, did not explicitly disclose this use in their privacy policies, raising concerns about user consent and data privacy. Interaxon has since updated its policy, acknowledging the need for explicit user information.