During World War II, the Manhattan Project was concerned about Nazi Germany's nuclear ambitions. Historians have debated how close German scientists, led by Werner Heisenberg, came to achieving criticality in their B8 reactor pile.
Heisenberg claimed they were close and only needed more uranium. However, a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nexus presents new findings that dispute this.
The new research concludes that the German project did not possess enough uranium or heavy water to construct a functional nuclear bomb, given their design. This directly contradicts Heisenberg's assessment of their progress.
The findings offer a more definitive explanation for the failure of the German nuclear program to achieve a nuclear weapon.
The research began in 2013 when University of Maryland physicist Timothy Koeth, a co-author of the paper, received one of the mysterious heavy metal cubes used by German scientists. He recognized it as a uranium cube from the unsuccessful reactor attempt.
Only 14 such cubes are currently known to exist. Koeth and Miriam Hiebert tracked down ten of these cubes across the US, including one at the Smithsonian Institute and another at Harvard University.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
New research, based on analysis of uranium cubes from Nazi Germany's nuclear program, indicates the project lacked sufficient uranium and heavy water for a working reactor. This contradicts earlier claims by Werner Heisenberg that they were close to criticality, providing a clearer historical understanding of the program's failure.