← All stories
● Covered by 1 source · 1 reportMedium impact1 neutral

Sanctioned Chinese Supercomputer Maker Sugon's ParaStor F9000 Removed from IO500 Production List

🔄 Updated 21h ago
New to BrevFeed? We gather this story from every outlet covering it into one summary — ranked by real-world impact, not just the latest headline — so you never miss what matters. What is BrevFeed? →

Key points

  • Sugon's ParaStor F9000 systems moved to Research IO500 list.
  • Lack of architectural details and general availability cited.
  • Intel's Aurora system retakes top position on Production list.
  • ParaStor F9000 previously outperformed Aurora by 2.46X.

IO500 Committee Decision

The IO500 Committee removed storage subsystems based on Sugon's ParaStor F9000 all-flash storage systems from its Production IO500 list. The reason given was that the system did not meet reproducibility requirements, specifically lacking sufficient architecture details and general availability.

As a result, these systems have been reclassified and moved to the Research IO500 list. The committee's statement confirmed that the previous number one position on the Production and Production 10-Client lists, held by Argonne's DAOS system (Intel's Aurora), has been restored.

Background on IO500 Rankings

The IO500 is a benchmark that ranks High-Performance Computing (HPC) storage systems based on their I/O performance, measuring overall bandwidth and I/O operations. It serves as a counterpart to the TOP500 list, which ranks supercomputers by computational performance.

Previous Performance of ParaStor F9000

At ISC 2026, SCNet submitted two systems utilizing ParaStor storage software and F9000 all-flash storage. The larger SCNet AICS-A submission achieved an IO500 score of 79,110.05, with 26,888.39 GiB/s of bandwidth and 232,754.76 kIOPS of metadata performance.

These results significantly surpassed Argonne National Laboratory's Aurora, which scored 32,165.90. The AICS-A's overall score was approximately 2.46 times higher than Aurora's, initially displacing Aurora from the top positions in both main Production and 10-Client Production rankings.

Impact on Rankings

The removal of Sugon's systems from the Production list means that Intel's Aurora, which uses a custom storage subsystem with Optane Persistent Memory modules, SSDs, and the DAOS file system, has retaken the top spot. This adjustment reflects the IO500 Committee's emphasis on transparency and accessibility for systems on its Production list.

✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →

The daily brief

One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.

One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Today's brief

Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.

~11 min · 9 stories · Sep 12

▶ Play today's brief Listen on Spotify

New every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.

Reporting from

The IO500 Committee moved Sugon's ParaStor F9000 storage systems from its Production IO500 list to the Research list due to a lack of architectural details and general availability. This change restored Intel's Aurora to the top spot on the Production list, impacting the ranking of high-performance computing storage systems.