Snap's AR glasses, Specs, have seen substantial improvements in their physical design. The device's weight has been nearly halved, now weighing 132 grams (approximately 4.6 ounces) compared to an earlier prototype's 8 ounces. This reduction contributes to a more comfortable wearing experience.
Further enhancing comfort, Specs are now offered in two sizes, 47mm and 52mm, to accommodate different head sizes. The inclusion of spring hinges also adds flexibility to the device, improving its fit. The updated version also addresses previous heating issues, remaining cool during extended use.
Despite the hardware advancements, the core utility of Specs remains undefined. The device, priced at $2,200, attempts to serve multiple functions without a clear primary purpose, leading to a perception of being rudderless. Inquiries to Snap staff regarding its intended use, whether for entertainment or productivity, yielded vague responses.
Potential daily applications for Specs are still being explored. One suggested use is for immersive mobile entertainment, such as watching TV or movies on public transportation, offering a more engaging experience than a smartphone. Integrations with services like HBO Max and YouTube support this entertainment-focused application.
✨ This summary was generated by AI from the outlets' reporting listed below. It is not independently verified and may contain errors — check the original sources. How BrevFeed works →
One email each morning: the day's tech stories, clustered across outlets and summarized. No account needed.
One email a day. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.
Spend a few minutes, get the whole day. Every topic's top stories in one hands-free rundown — listen, watch, or read the transcript.
▶ Play today's briefNew every morning, and the back catalogue is archived by date.
Snap's AR glasses, Specs, have undergone significant design improvements, reducing their weight by nearly half to 132 grams and introducing two sizes and spring hinges for better comfort. While the hardware has improved, the device still lacks a clear daily use-case, making its $2,200 price point questionable for general consumers.